On a Mission from God

Today we tackle the question, “what did Jesus come to do?” Much as we might assume that most “church folks” could give a ready answer to that question, the fact is that there are many who couldn’t give the right answer. The world certainly has a lot of varied ideas:

Even as followers of Christ, we can short-change the big picture story of what the coming of Jesus was all about. If we are not careful, we can reduce it to simply the story of how God could get you and me to Heaven when we die. And when we reduce the story to that limited perspective, we run the risk of making the work of God more about us and our wellbeing than about God and His glory. And so America’s largest “church” has as its theme, “Discovering the Champion in You”, and its pastor has written three books (note the theme): Your Best Life Now; Becoming a Better You; It’s Your Time. Interestingly, some people mistake these books as being remotely “Christian”.

And so it’s critical that we not understand the coming of Jesus to earth primarily to be about us; rather, our

Big Idea:
The purpose of the coming of Christ was to accomplish God’s plan to reconcile sinful people to Himself.

In preparing for this message, I took a look at all the Scriptures in which Jesus is recorded as having said, “I came”, or “I have come”, to…and when you do a study like that, you get some interesting results. I have incorporated most—not all—of those passages into today’s message, so that the words of Jesus Himself determine the answer to the question.

I. The Anticipation of the Mission
Jesus came on a mission from God, fulfilling the Old Testament promises of a Messiah/Deliverer.
Here’s what Jesus had to say in His Sermon on the Mount: “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them” – Matthew 5:17.

Jesus understood Himself to be the fulfillment of everything that the Old Testament had pointed to in terms of a coming Messiah. It’s critical that He’d say something like this; many folks in listening to His words would have been tempted to hear Him saying that He was doing away with everything that had come before, and was starting over. After all, He said and did some very radical things, confronting the religion boys, going against their traditions and conventions, slaying some of their sacred cows and acting in ways that a “religious person”, as they understood it, wouldn’t act. In fact, in a message in which we are talking about why Christ came into the world, let’s hear one particularly upsetting understanding of His mission that Jesus shared:

34 “Do not think that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I have not come to bring peace, but a sword. 35 For I have come to set a man against his father, and a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law. 36 And a person’s enemies will be those of his own household. 37 Whoever loves father or mother more than me is not worthy of me, and whoever loves son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me. 38 And whoever does not take his cross and follow me is not worthy of me. 39 Whoever finds his life will lose it, and whoever loses his life for my sake will find it
” – Matthew 10:34-39.

That doesn’t come off as either a limp-wristed girly man Jesus, such as some folks envision, nor does it sound like a Messiah Who is going to come and deliver Israel from its oppressors. And yet, His message was that He was in perfect harmony with what had been prophesied.

Further, if it’s God’s plan, God’s mission, then it’s God Who receives the glory when He pulls it off. We have to drive this stake down deep into the marrow of our Christian understanding and experience: it’s not about you. And it’s not about me.

II. The Purpose of the Mission
The mission was to accomplish reconciliation between the living God and sinful, dying man.
Jesus saw Himself clearly as coming to do the will of God. He was on a mission from God; listen to John 6:

“I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will but the will of him who sent me. 39 And this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up on the last day. 40 For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who looks on the Son and believes in him should have eternal life, and I will raise him up on the last day” – John 6:38-40.

And the work God had in mind from eternity past was the work of bringing back to God the Father those who had been estranged from Him due to their sin. “God was in Christ, reconciling the world to Himself”, the Scripture says. Reconciliation connotes estrangement, that something has taken place between God and man to drive a wedge, and that something is sin. That’s not unusual; we experience estrangement from other people, and it’s always—always—caused by sin. I was speaking with a young man this week who is estranged from his mother, and this was certainly the case. Man’s biggest problem is that the God Who created him is, according to Scripture, His enemy—not because God has done the estranging, but because man has turned his back on God and sinned, creating the chasm between God’s holiness and man’s sinfulness. And nothing man can do can bridge the gap—hence Jesus.

III. The Center of the Mission
The mission centered on Jesus’ atoning death on the cross as the sacrifice for our sin.
Down the road several weeks, we’ll further unpack the significance of the cross, but for now, we state that it is at the very center. There are branches of so-called Christianity which downplay the cross, the atonement, which look almost with embarrassment that anyone would consider the cross to be so central. They focus on the Incarnation instead, at which time God condescended to be identified with us as human beings. In no way do I diminish the fact of the Incarnation of course, but Jesus didn’t come just to hang out with us so that He could prove He was a swell dude who liked to hang with His buds; He came to do for us what no one else could possibly do: give His life as a ransom for many

“…the Son of Man came not to be served but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many” – Mark 10:45.

Only He could accomplish this. No mere man could, by his death, effect anything other than his own death—for no mere man, sinful himself, would have any authority to perform such a task.

It was after the chain of events that would culminate in His crucifixion had already begun that we hear Jesus’ words in John 12:

“Now is my soul troubled. And what shall I say, ‘Father, save me from this hour’? But for this purpose I have come to this hour. 28 Father, glorify your name.” Then a voice came from heaven: “I have glorified it, and I will glorify it again”
– John 12:27-28.

He knew what lay ahead; it had been foreordained from eternity past: His suffering and death on the cross. There was no denying this; in Scripture after Scripture, it is clear that Jesus knew that the end of His earthly road lay at Calvary, that this was the center of His purpose for coming. If “God was in Christ reconciling the world to Himself”, as the Scripture says, and the medium was the cross. We cannot speak with any credibility whatever about the mission of Christ without seeing at its heart a cross. This was the means God in His infinite wisdom chose to accomplish His grand purpose of redeeming and reconciling sinful man to Himself. What a strange, incredible choice: to take an instrument of shame and humiliation, a device for exacting capital punishment upon a criminal, and making of it the very symbol of our faith. But this wasn’t man’s plan; it was God’s. Jesus came to reconcile us to Himself, and it was through the cross of Calvary that He paid the price for our redemption and accomplished the work. Finally, see

IV. The Result of the Mission
Jesus created a new race of people: citizens of the Kingdom.
The purpose of Christ in coming was to reconcile sinners to Himself through His death on the cross, but it was not to leave them as unconnected sinners doing their own things with relation to God. Rather, in reconciling the world to Himself, God opened the door to reconciling man to man in the same way.

Look at the people, then, who Jesus reached out to, inviting them into His kingdom:
• Simon the Leper – social outcast
• Woman who wiped His feet with her hair
• Tax collector (Matthew, Zacchaeus)
• Insurrectionist (Simon the Zealot)
• Rough-cut fisherman (Peter, etc.)
• Adulteress whom Jesus pronounced forgiven (2 of them, actually! John 4, 8)
• Women in general
• Children in general

Jesus broke social taboos and rules and didn’t seem to care one whit for the considered opinions of the religious shakers and movers of the day. Philip Yancey calls it the “Great Reversal”, Jesus standing convention on its head as He announced in the Beatitudes; Jesus knew no undesirables, never met an unwanted person, for God’s love desires to make itself known to all, and there is a place in God’s heart for those who are rejected by the power brokers of this world. What passage did Jesus read in the synagogue in Nazareth at the inception of His ministry? From Isaiah’s prophecy He read,

“The Spirit of the Lord is upon me,
because he has anointed me
to proclaim good news to the poor.
He has sent me to proclaim liberty to the captives
and recovering of sight to the blind,
to set at liberty those who are oppressed,
19 to proclaim the year of the Lord’s favor.”

But what’s more, Jesus came not only to bring into God’s kingdom all sorts of people who were outcasts among Jewish society, but to extend God’s kingdom to Gentile outcasts as well. Ephesians 2:11-22:

Therefore remember that at one time you Gentiles in the flesh, called “the uncircumcision” by what is called the circumcision, which is made in the flesh by hands— 12 remember that you were at that time separated from Christ, alienated from the commonwealth of Israel and strangers to the covenants of promise, having no hope and without God in the world. 13 But now in Christ Jesus you who once were far off have been brought near by the blood of Christ. 14 For he himself is our peace, who has made us both one and has broken down in his flesh the dividing wall of hostility 15 by abolishing the law of commandments expressed in ordinances, that he might create in himself one new man in place of the two, so making peace, 16 and might reconcile us both to God in one body through the cross, thereby killing the hostility. 17 And he came and preached peace to you who were far off and peace to those who were near. 18 For through him we both have access in one Spirit to the Father. 19 So then you are no longer strangers and aliens, but you are fellow citizens with the saints and members of the household of God, 20 built on the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Christ Jesus himself being the cornerstone, 21 in whom the whole structure, being joined together, grows into a holy temple in the Lord. 22 In him you also are being built together into a dwelling place for God by the Spirit.

Jesus came on a mission to fulfill God’s purpose: reconciling man from sin to Himself, and building a people out of every facet of human society into a people for Himself and His glory. This is who we are—we find ourselves in the story line of God’s gracious eternal plan. And God continues that plan today, calling men and women, boys and girls to join Him in the fulfillment of that plan.

Questions for Group Study

• It surprised the “religion boys” that Jesus spent so much time hanging out with, and seemed at ease with, some of the “riff-raff” of society. He didn’t “act religious”.
o What does that tell us about Jesus?
o What should that teach us about us, His followers?

• Liberals focus on the Incarnation as being the critical component of faith. Why do we say that the Incarnation, as important as it is, is secondary to the Atonement?

• The following Scriptures all involve Jesus telling us why He came into the world. Read them, and fit them into the basic outline of why Christ came:
o Luke 5:29-32
o Luke 19:10
o John 10:7-10
o John 12:46
o John 18:33-38

• Read Hebrews 10:4-7. Why was it necessary for Jesus—God come in the flesh—to make the sacrifice for our sins? Could another human being have done it? Why not? And what did His sacrifice accomplish?

Leave a Comment

Live, Jive, or Memorex?

February 14, 2010

We might term this series an “apologetic” series of messages; apologetics is the field of study that seeks to bolster our faith by talking about evidences for the validity of Christian faith. The point of this series is developing a deeper understanding of God’s Word and a deeper knowledge of Jesus, with the upshot being that my desire is for each of us to love Jesus more, because I’m convinced that the cure to what ails us as individuals and as a church is in truly loving Jesus more, because when I love Him more, I worship Him more deeply and serve Him more faithfully and follow Him more closely.

I am indebted for the sermon title today, as well as some of the thoughts for this message, to Professor Darrell Bock of Dallas Seminary. Professor Bock’s thinking is very cogent and helpful, and I thank the Lord for good instructors in the Word like this brother.

How can we really know what Jesus said? Look at the stakes here: as Christ-followers, we’ve staked everything on the truthfulness of what Jesus said and did. Christian faith is very much a history-linked faith: it teaches that certain acts took place in history, and it purports to make sense of those events as being part of God’s plan of redemption, rooted in real history. If the history is wrong; if the facts are bad; if the events of Scripture didn’t take place, we’ve got bupkus, zero, zilch, nada, nothing. And so, first,

I. The Issues
• We have only a fraction of Jesus’ words recorded.
When he went ashore he saw a great crowd, and he had compassion on them, because they were like sheep without a shepherd. And he began to teach them many things. 35 And when it grew late, his disciples came to him and said, “This is a desolate place, and the hour is now late. 36 Send them away to go into the surrounding countryside and villages and buy themselves something to eat” – Luke 6:34-36

Jesus spoke for hours at a time, apparently—and we don’t have anything nearly that long recorded in the Bible. So Jesus said a lot that didn’t get recorded.

• We don’t have a record of nearly all that He did.
Here is how John concludes his gospel: “Now there are also many other things that Jesus did. Were every one of them to be written, I suppose that the world itself could not contain the books that would be written”
– John 21:25

The gospels contain only a fraction of Jesus’ actions. A lot of times, what we read are words like Matthew 9:35: “And Jesus went throughout all the cities and villages, teaching in their synagogues and proclaiming the gospel of the kingdom and healing every disease and every affliction.” It’s a summary statement, talking about His teaching and His healing, but not giving specifics on every detail of those healings, of that teaching, and so on. But there is plenty we do have—the question there is, how do we know it’s accurate? Next,

• The gospel accounts do not line up chronologically.
When you read the same events described in different gospels, it’s clear: there is little chronological agreement between the different authors; frankly, every gospel author steps outside of chronological precision at one point or another. Finally,

• Sometimes, the wording differs from account to account.
That’s just undeniable fact: different gospel writers use different terminology to frame the words of Jesus. Their phrasing doesn’t contradict, mind you; it’s just different. If I say, “the Saints beat the Colts in the Super Bowl Sunday”, you’ll hear some cheering and others softly weeping, but saying “the Saints beat the Colts” is no different than saying, “the Colts were beaten by the Saints.” I’ve conveyed the exact same message—hold that thought for later…

Further compounding this entire issue, Jesus spoke in Aramaic; the New Testament was written in Greek. Jesus’ words were already a translation by the time they were recorded by the Gospel writers!

Put all of these items together, and there are those who ask, can we really know what Jesus actually said and did? Did the gospel writers write selectively, or worse, did they tidy up the stories, or did they insert their own words among those of Jesus in order to gussy up the story in order to fit their agendas?

II. The Options
As I said earlier, I borrowed the title of the message from Professor Darrell Bock: “Live, Jive, or Memorex?” When we come to the things that the Bible records as true of Jesus’ life and words, is which of these three approaches will we take? Which is really most faithful to what we understand about Scripture?

A. “Jive”
Some folks treat the words of Jesus like they were so much jive, at least as regards the words recorded in the Bible. When a liberal scholar approaches the Bible, he sees in it a book written merely by men, a book with a mixture of truth and error, good and bad, prejudices and the like. And so when he comes to the words of Jesus, he doesn’t necessarily accept anything in the Bible attributed to Jesus to actually have been said by Him. To the liberal scholar, the writers of Scripture took liberties with Jesus’ words, put into His mouth things He never said nor meant. Basically, the gospel writers are spinning a story in order to establish and build this human organization known as the church, and if they have to fudge the truth, well, that’s just what they’ll do. This is the viewpoint of those who see the words of Jesus in the gospels as just so much “jive.”

B. “Memorex”
Some folks treat the red-letter words of Jesus like they were Memorex—the very exact, word-by-word rendering of what Jesus said. But there’s a problem with that. What are we to make of the fact that gospel writers, recording the very same events, put different words into the mouth of Jesus? Here’s an example (ESV—chances are your translation does something similar. The context is Jesus pronouncing that Bartimaeus, the blind man, is being healed:

“Recover your sight; your faith has made you well” – Luke 18:42
“Go your way; your faith has made you well” – Mark 10:52

OK…so which did He say? See the problem for those who take the “Memorex” approach? This does happen with decent frequency—and this leaves these well-meaning folks with a difficult dilemma. But let’s look at a third option, what Bock calls the “live” option, one that maintains an ironclad belief in the fact that the Bible is telling the truth in all that it affirms, but one which also recognizes the way we use speech, as well as the way the Scriptures were written; Bock calls it

C. “Live”
How ‘bout a little Latin? Two similar terms for your consideration:

Ipsissima verba“The very words”
We have some examples in Scripture that are clearly “ipsissima verba”, such as what Jesus cried out on the cross: “Eli, eli, lama sabacthani”, which translated means, “My God, my God, why have You forsaken Me?” Basically, the idea of “ipsissima verba” suggests what we’d call “verbatim”; in other words, word-for-word perfect reproduction. This is the “Memorex” option.

Ipsissima vox“The very voice”
This suggests a way of understanding the words used by the gospel writers as capturing the exact essence of what Jesus was saying, that under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit. And it seems to me that ipsissima vox, rather than ipsissima verba, is the correct understanding of the way the gospel writers wrote. Remember my Saints/Colts analogy? I’ve said the exact same thing two different ways. And it wouldn’t be incorrect, had I only said it one way, for you to render it the other in telling it to a friend. That’s ipsissima vox.

Note what Luke says of his gospel, from the first four verses of that gospel: “Inasmuch as many have undertaken to compile a narrative of the things that have been accomplished among us, 2 just as those who from the beginning were eyewitnesses and ministers of the word have delivered them to us, 3 it seemed good to me also, having followed all things closely for some time past, to write an orderly account for you, most excellent Theophilus, 4 that you may have certainty concerning the things you have been taught.”

So what was Luke trying to accomplish in writing his gospel?
• To tell the truth about Jesus (“certainty”, v. 4)
• To gather from eyewitnesses as much information as he could so as to get the gist of what Jesus said and did
Some of what Luke wrote was not firsthand information—it was information gleaned from others who were eyewitnesses. Again, let us say with complete conviction: Luke and the other gospel writers were writing under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit.

But understanding the way the gospel writers went about things, working from an “ipsissima vox” approach rather than a rigid “ipsissima verba” approach, helps us also with the fact that the writers choose to emphasize different things, place events in a structure that is not rigidly chronological, and the like. Depending on one’s vantage point, one might see and stress different aspects of the same story, and in retelling it would be likely to emphasize those things of significance to him. The idea that what we have in Scripture is “live” is that we have a faithful rendering of the words and life of Christ. And this is what matters, that we base our faith on truth.

III. The Significance
• We ought to understand the Bible on its terms and not ones of our own making.
There are some people who feel that in order to guard the Bible, they have to almost ignore certain clear evidence, or to engage in literary gymnastics, bending over backwards to try to explain things instead of trusting that God knew what He was doing. They hang their hats on a certain understanding of things instead of just trusting that what we have is God’s perfect Word. And thus,

• We ought to claim for Scripture what it claims for itself: perfect infallibility.
Jesus’ own claim was that not a jot or a tittle, not the smallest diacritical mark in the Hebrew language, would pass away until the entire truth of God’s Word was fulfilled. Paul makes the claim that “all Scripture is inspired by God”, and inherent in that is the understanding that if God inspired it, it cannot have errors in it. This is what we believe, and defend, which leads us to our final point:

• We ought to be ready to give a defense—a knowledgeable, reasoned defense—for what we believe (I Peter 3:15).
This is a Scriptural requirement; this is why a message like today’s is important to our faith. The core of our faith is the work of Christ on the cross, His death for us and resurrection whereby we can have forgiveness of sin and a right standing with God. Part of giving witness to the gospel of Christ is being able to answer the sincere questions raised by others. That’s the bottom line: we must know the truth, be prepared to defend the truth, and eager to share it with others.

Questions for Study
• This entire series deals with apologetics. One definition says “Christian apologetics is a field of Christian theology that aims to present a rational basis for the Christian faith, defend the faith against objections, and expose the perceived flaws of other world views.” What is the value of apologetics? Are there limits to its value, and what might these be?
• Jesus spoke Aramaic; the gospels were written in Greek. How might that fact alone cause two different writers to render Jesus’ words differently? If you speak a foreign language, your insight might be especially helpful in answering this question!
• Do you understand the difference between “ipsissima verba” and “ipsissima vox”? Does it make sense that some Christians might be concerned when we speak of using “ipsissima vox” rather than “ipsissima verba” to understand the words of Christ? What would you say to a Christian with that concern?
• Read Luke 1:1-4 together.
o How did Luke go about putting together his gospel?
o How might the inspiration of the Holy Spirit have worked in conjunction with Luke’s work?
o Does the fact that this passage sounds like the same process any chronicler of history might use lead you to trust the Scriptural accounts more, or less? Why?
• A person says to you, “The Bible was written so long ago. Different writers give the timeline differently, and record Jesus’ words differently. How can you trust what it says?” How might you answer?

Leave a Comment